Blake Lively has escalated her legal battle against Justin Baldoni, claiming the actor-director asked her an inappropriate and intrusive question about her intimate life with husband Ryan Reynolds. The lawsuit alleges that Baldoni pressured Lively during filming and made her feel uncomfortable on set.
According to the lawsuit, Lively alleges that Baldoni asked whether she and Reynolds "climax simultaneously during intercourse," a question she found invasive and refused to discuss. She also claims Baldoni pressured her to "orgasm" on camera during a scene they had previously agreed to remove.
The legal complaint states that Baldoni justified keeping the scene by citing his own personal experiences, saying he and his partner climax together.
Related: Justin Baldoni’s Set Insider Calls Blake Lively’s Claims Lies
Lively’s updated filing suggests that two other actresses from It Ends With Us may come forward with evidence supporting her claims. Additionally, she accused Baldoni’s co-producer, Jamie Heath, of making her uncomfortable by showing her a personal video she initially mistook for explicit content.
Text messages included in the lawsuit reportedly show Lively expressing frustration and referring to Baldoni and Heath as “scumbags” for their behavior.
Baldoni’s legal team has denied all allegations, calling the lawsuit “underwhelming” and lacking substantial evidence. His attorney, Bryan Freedman, claims that unnamed sources in the complaint do not appear willing to publicly support Lively’s claims.
To counter Lively’s accusations, Baldoni’s team released footage from the film, arguing that it demonstrates professionalism rather than misconduct. Additionally, Baldoni launched a website to present his side of the story, including alleged text exchanges with Lively and Reynolds.
Related: Blake Lively: 2 Costars to Testify in Justin Baldoni Case
Lively’s legal representatives have requested access to Baldoni’s phone and internet data to investigate possible efforts to discredit her claims. Meanwhile, the judge overseeing the case has warned both parties against publicizing details, stating that the trial, scheduled for March 2026, could be expedited if necessary.